Have you ever wondered what it would be like to use the Mind's Power to Remote Influence?
Using the Mind's Power to Remote Influence
Remote Influencing refers to a very advanced technology, transcending most other known methods, by which one can powerfully influence thoughts and consensual reality by mind-power and inner energy alone.
The interview covers:
- How you can then have all the abilities that man can think of made available to YOU to inherently change your reality, just by changing your belief system
- Remote viewing insights into the inner and outer world that explain tough topics like the after life, karma, reincarnation and organized religion in ways you’ve never heard before…
- What is the best way to deal with a person or group and influence it to a harmonious outcome?
LISTEN TO YOUR INTERVIEW HERE
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Click here to download your interview >>
(To download, right click the link above and
choose "Save Target As…" or "Save Link As…")
What are your thoughts on tough topics like the after life, karma, reincarnation and organized religion?
Don't forget to leave your comment!
Hi There,
Its a Good day for all of us !
I believe Gerald is a "WayShower" in this time period. I'm not sure if he knows/believes that or not, but anyway there is a website that explans all about if you would allow him and others to goto. The website is=
http://goldring.wetpaint.com/page/1-TheGame
in the top left side corner it says (WIKI Pages) start with #1-TheGame and go through the videos down the page then click on next video to continue with the total understanding..
I would Love to hear Gerald's outlook on this website..
Gerald call me about two weeks ago wanting to know if I was a member or not,, my name in full is
(Leonard Jairan Giles) living in Grapevine, Tx
I myself don't feel this was chance.........
Peace and Love to all
Loved the interview! I have older cassette versions of the Remote Viewing and the Remote Influencing courses and am wondering if there are any changes in the newer CD versions.
I loved the interview. I have listened to it several times. When Gerald takes about releasing fear, is it all fear? I have fears that started way before I can remember that have effected my life in untold ways, a few I have become aware of in recent years. Will releasing fear through your method release me from these threads that have long held me bound?
I look foreword to hearing the next interview! Great info!
Hello. The interview was really eye opening and blew my mind. My concern has been raised by another and I would be greatful to get more info regarding this in that when you enter these other frequencies a whole lot of undesirable energies exist there as well, if you could ask him to explain if there are any vulnerabilities to look out for and how to be protected from these.
Otherwise I am really excited about this course, It is the answer to the many questions I have had for such a long time.
Keep up the excellent work.
This question was asked and I too would like an answer. Why do we experience fear, especially when we venture into the unknown mind. If all ends well in the Creator anyway - why the constant fear? What is its purpose?
Wow! I cannot believe how you would censor me like that, just because I wasn't creaming my jeans over this Gerald guy like everyone else! All I did was what YOU ASKED in your email and that was to present a question to Mr O'Donnell and YOU removed it!!!! You MUST be gaining financially from this or there is no way you would have done so. I was polite and all I did was to bring into focus some dubious questions regarding this fellow's past. Here is the link again for the non-sheep out there:
http://www.remoteviewer.org/remoteviewing/odonnel.htm
And Michael, I would suggest you do NOT remove the post this time or not only will I continue to repost under different names, I will blacken YOUR name on all the forums out there. Sorry if this runs counter to any monetary incentives you've been offered by this O'Donnell guy, but I believe in truth, fairness and freedom of speech. Maybe you should too.
I almost find this funny. What a waste of energy the dark is!
I a sure all of you face the same every day and know that the best way to deflect it is to look at it for what it is: an illusion and a test of strength and resolve.
I am sorry that you even have to be exposed to such low energy stuff however just for your sake as the role of darkness is always to attack light and instill doubt in our minds I feel obliged to therefore clarify something:
Remoteviewer.org is run and owned by a certain Dane Spotts owner of a commecial RV company called TRV (PSITECH http://www.remoteviewing.com/)co-owned by the same guy and Joni Dourif. This site seems to be a way to promote their wares, by spreading negativity using lies and false rumors about almost everybody else in the RV field who they feel is true competition.
Don Spotts used to run Zygon international, inc.
Remoteviewer.org is not an independent .org (organization) but very much a commercial site purposing to gift "unbiased" info about known RVers and run by Don which does not bode well for his integrity.
You can see this for yourselves by doing a WHOIS search on that domain name
http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/results.jsp?domain=remoteviewer.org
Domain ID:D31740069-LROR
Domain Name:REMOTEVIEWER.ORG
Created On:22-Jul-2000 05:02:32 UTC
Last Updated On:23-Jun-2007 08:29:50 UTC
Expiration Date:22-Jul-2008 05:02:32 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:eNom, Inc. (R39-LROR)
Status:OK
Registrant ID:ZD540-BR
Registrant Name:dane spotts
Registrant Organization:LifeQuest
Registrant Street1:p.o. box 1444
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:issaquah
Registrant State/Province:WA
Registrant Postal Code:98027
Registrant Country:US
Competition can be a wonderful thing and we welcome it as long as the individuals involved are of a high moral fiber and caliber and care about Oneness instead of promoting division.
Much of the information on that site is laced with personal attacks and falsehood. The story planted about me and Buchanan is a flat lie. Period.
To attack Michael who I find to be a true gentleman and a very high soul is just a reflection of where you come from.
The issue is closed on my end. I have forgiven you.
I send you Love and Light and hope that it will blend well with your soul and bring you peace.
Gerald
In response to the above post by Ian K, I cam across this website:
http://www.remoteviewinglight.com/html/buchanan.html
Hi, I really enjoyed.thanks.
After reading through all of the responses, it seems that there are questions and fears that people have who have bought the Remote Viewing and Remote Influencing CD's. If Gerald O'Donnell doesn't have a support group for his customers, he should seriously consider making one available.
Another point, Gerald needs to respond to the "bad press" that is on the internet about his background and the validity/effectiveness of his training.
I just wanted to know what gerald thinks about how we can heal illnesses...?
Thank you
RE: Gerald's post above, I wonder why Gerald views dark energy as "attacking"? Is it just his perception of what is happening, or does he know it for certain?
In my universe, dark energy doesn't attack, it operates via intention and attraction. The word "attack" connotes a good/evil aspect to me, which is a value judgment that is relative to the perceiver.
Does the dark energy behave differently when an emotion is placed upon an energy flow by the perceiver, rather than viewing it as simply energy? I think yes, it does. Because there is a relationship between the energy and the perceiver (observer).
Thank you very much for responding Mr O'Donnell. If you'll excuse me for a moment, I'll respond to your comments in a second, but I'd first like to reply quickly to Ariel K. Ariel, the website you referred to is Gerald O'Donnell's site or at least endorsed by him and the same one mentioned by Lyn Buchanan in his critique that I gave the link to. Lyn says this about it, "He responded by putting a huge and very slanderous tyrade about me on his web site (it's still there, if you want to see it". Thank you anyway for trying to help out.
Now, back to you Mr O'Donnell...
While I appreciate you replying, what you said was not really an answer to the points raised, was it? You gave what I like to call a 'political answer', which basically means you spoke a lot but really didn't say anything!
You did what a lot of people do and that was to start using silly esoteric imagery to define me - a person you do not know - as somehow evil and you say it in first sentence, in which you also say you almost find it funny. This implies that you are being condescending as well. You fail (or are scared) to appreciate that you are making a claim of huge proportions and you are trying to SELL that claim to us as potential customers, so my asking pertinent questions about your background and your authenticity are not 'dark' anything, they are very relevant and you not answering them straight out could easily be perceived as hiding in the 'dark'. Do you see this? I am not being nasty. Merely stating facts which can be observed by anyone with critical thinking capabilities.
This leads us onto the subject of doubt. Doubt is one of the most essential requisites of a thinking human being. It separates us from sheep. If you did not have rational doubt then you would be a very gullible and ingenuous person. Doubt is the essence of questionning and questionning is why are now in the age of internet debates and no longer sitting in caves worshipping sticks. So for you to attack doubt as if it was something bad then I'm afraid it is YOU who are endorsing 'dark energy'!
Now, let us address the things in question again shall we? And let see if you can shed some LIGHT on them.
First, you say: "The story planted about me and Buchanan is a flat lie. Period." Ok. If it is it would appear you are now pointing the finger at Dane Spotts (who you started calling Don halfway through your reply. I wonder if I was the only one to find this strange and it makes me wonder about how accurate you are remote viewing things unseen when you can't even keep a guy's name consistent!) & Joni Dourif as perpetrators of the lie, and if so then how come you give such a virulent tirade against Mr Buchanan here?:
http://www.remoteviewinglight.com/html/buchanan.html
(This is the same link as given by Ariel K, above). You seem to be shifting blame around. I'm sorry if this isn't so, but thats how it appears. Kinda like you are keeping people 'in the DARK'.
So, wanting to keep everything out of the shadows, answer these please with a simple yes or no:
1. Did you write to Mr Buchanan and tell him you were in the same military unit as him?
2. Did you threaten to sue him?
3. I ask you to comment on all the points raised in the 4th paragraph on that site - the one about 'Jason'.
Remember, that if you don't answer with yes or no, then it will be construed as a SHADY answer. Keep in mind too that if you say yes or no and its a lie and Mr Buchanan or others has evidence to the contrary, then YOU could be sued for libel. Hush... if you are a light bringer then you have nothing to fear, right?
Ok,I will no longer talk in such childish terms. I just cannot stand people who play silly word games and if you answer again then I would appreciate that you correspond in plain English and keep your flowery language for people who like to sit open mouthed at the feet of masters - enlightened or otherwise.
I'll finish up by saying (which I know you won't believe, but nevertheless is true) that all of the things I have asked ARE JUST QUESTIONS. I do not know you personally or any of the other remote viewing celebrities. All I want is straight talk and no bullshit. I am NOT going to by anything peddled by a shyster and so I demand openess. Surely someone as supposedly humanitarian as yourself understands this need, no?
As for my comment against Michael, I said this because my first post was not there when I came back to check. I either overlooked it (don't think so) or it has re-emerged since I came back again. If it is the former, then I fully apologise to Michael. My questions to you still stand though and I would like answers.
Please see this as the inquiry it is, for I assure you it is nothing more than that. When it comes to 'light bringers' you will be hard pressed to find anyone more committed than I for this cause.
Best regards,
Ian K
"I send you Love and Light and hope that it will blend well with your soul and bring you peace.
Gerald"
Looks like it did not blend in... Ian K., for God sake, this is annoying! I just don't understand why people like you can't sleep at night when someone is successful, and have to keep on bringing negativity driven by... jealousy may be? What I sence from your posts are really low vibs.
And this: "And Michael, I would suggest you do NOT remove the post this time or not only will I continue to repost under different names, I will blacken YOUR name on all the forums out there", speaks of WHO YOU REALLY ARE and your apology does not change it. Please do yourself and people here a favor - QUIT IT!
Mr. O'Donnell, I enjoyed both of your interviews - amazing information!
My gratitude to you and Michael. Great job!
Oops! In my third to last paragraph, I said, "I am NOT going to by anything peddled by a shyster".... I meant 'BUY', not 'by'. Sorry!
common' people, enough of this stuff...back and forth....you Mr. smart go directly to Gerald, do not use this site, which has totally different meaning and reason for exsisting...to through stones at each other...endless who said what, who is right, who is not, who is a saint and who sinner...to use your strong, plain american language: enough of this bullshit!
find his e-mail address and spit on each other as much as you want and do not use this or other helpful posts to indulge in your personal opinions about certain people or for any angry, upseting "revengeful purposes!
GOT IT?
Michael, you should stop posting the rest of this "tennis mach" on your site...that is something between them, the rest of us want to concentrate on more useful and close to the specific subject stuff...!
Enough with this annoying sharade!~
Great interview, and Thanks (-:
Michael: while I appreciate your bringing the work of these remote reviewers to the attention of the public, your enthusiastic and seemingly uncritical endorsement of both Ed Danes and Gerald O'Donnell leaves a lot of questions unanswered. If some of the sites I've reviewed are to be believed, Ed has a miserable record as a prognosticator and has fraudulently represented his background. Apparently, according to Buchanan, Gerald is no better. Now this could simply be cut-throat competition among professionals, but these charges and counter charges would need to be fully addressed and laid to rest before any grown up with a reasonably critical mind could comfortably buy their courses on remote viewing. Michael, you request that prospective customers post their questions via your blog, but I can see that Gerald actually refuses to answer some legitimate inquiries and in fact attacks those who ask these questions. Why doesn't this set off any of YOUR alarm bells? I mean, you're reading these posts too. Frankly, to my way of thinking, it hurts the Silva brand to be associated with anything that even remotely smacks of potential dishonesty and hucksterism. People who are telling the truth and can back it up never have to dodge questions. Surely we all know that?
I've listened to both interviews, and appreciate the opportunity for expansion. I am intrigued by some of the denser, seemingly stuck vibratory energy offered by some of the respondents here.....why the anger....or maybe this is better stated as fear? If something does not resonate, then be transparent to it. And if there's a need to be self-righteous, to denigrate due to fear, or for your own reality to be heard, then do so. And it is received with Gratitude, and great Compassion. But perhaps offering it once is enough.
I've done some research, as I have studied the courses that Gerald offers, and wanted to see what is out there on some of these repeated questions. I came across this site: http://web.archive.org/web/19990221134525/www.crviewer.com/xgeraldo.htm
in which Mr. Buchanan states: "Mr. O'Donnell - in his initial email - was up front about the fact that he was not in the US military's project. Reading his web page, I did not get the impression that he was quite so clear about that. In short, he may have been a member of some other country's project, but was never a part of the US government's project in any way."
So that answers that question. I would offer one final thought that has been stated by many beautiful beings on the questions we should ask ourselves to determine if we should say something. If we answer "no" to any one of them, it is gently recommended that we remain silent:
1. Is it true?
2. Is it necessary?
3. Is it kind?
It may seem so challenging, and yet it is one of the most simple and loving acts of Creation.
I wish you all a day overflowing with kindness.
To Linda,
I'm sorry you have such difficulty mistaking critical thinking with negativity. Just because someone uses the words such as 'peace & love' it means nothing. If you read the rest of his reply you would have seen that there was a thinly disguised accusation. When I read yours it is even thinner! lol Maybe both of you should take up this 'love and light' stuff that you both preach but neither really possess. Or perhaps better still all I need is to set up a website and claim I can transform dog crap into piles of gold and for $300 for you to come rushing out to buy it and defend me if anyone should question my claims!
Your post was summed up in the words, "I just don’t understand". Clearly.
More quotes of yours with my responses:
"and have to keep on bringing negativity" - I didn't. I asked valid questions. Mr O'Donnell was the one who started making it childish and bringing in dark and light, not me.
"speaks of WHO YOU REALLY ARE and your apology does not change it. Please do yourself and people here a favor - QUIT IT!" - Really? 1. I will not quit anything because some silly person with the inability to understand reason tells me to. And 2. My apology was genuine. I honestly thought I had been censored and as this is not the case, then I AM truly sorry to Michael. The guy is being very nice and allowing us to listen to these men. I have never said anything against that. What I do question is whether these people are truly capable of doing what they say. From what I have seen, the answer is a big NO. This isn't negative, its a fact, just like day follows night. This is not positive or negative either, it is simply so. I can't help if you can't see it.
And last but not least: "Mr. O’Donnell, I enjoyed both of your interviews - amazing information!" - Belief without questioning is why the world is in the state it is, i.e. DARK. Sorry Linda, but it is you and people like you who are the cause of it.
----------------------------------
Therese,
Thank you for the link. What I would like though is for Mr O'Donnell to explain why if all of this bad blood between him and Buchanan is manufactured, then why does the link I gave in my last post still exist with HIS name on the copyright at the bottom? This suggests endorsement of the statements contained therein.
As for your own question (a nice, sneaky, "Shut up Ian", if ever I've heard one! lol), you said:
"If we answer “no” to any one of them, it is gently recommended that we remain silent:
1. Is it true?
2. Is it necessary?
3. Is it kind?"
Answers: 1. We do not know. Thus the need for questioning in the first place and not taking things on mere belief.
2. Absolutely. We are trying to establish whether the interviewee is truly what he says he is or just a charlatan. Remember the magnitude of the claims here folks. I'm sorry, but it is quite unsettling how people just accept so blindly. Remember too that he is SELLING something. If you wish to part with hard earned cash without first establishing the veracity of the claimant then go right ahead. Be all light and loving... and out of pocket!
3. Lastly, the most important question of all. YES, my questions ARE kind, for I am trying to do what is best and find out what is true (your question number 1!). What seems to have escaped Linda is that questioning does not = BAD. I have a question of my own and I hope you all understand the meaning: Would you prefer to have a doctor who told you that everything was fine and here were some pills to dull the pain or have another one who told you that you had a ruptured gall bladder and needed painful surgery straight away? Well? Who is the kinder, lighter, loving, soulful one? The softly softly one or the one telling you how it is and who could save your life? I ask you all to ponder my statements before coming back with some downright NASTY replies. Thank you.
Ian.
Therese,
You too are being very self righteous! What that guy was saying makes a lot of sense and the link you show here pretty much condemns Gerald O for good. Did you read it properly?
OK
I hear you people having valid and somewhat sensible discusions about these courses, etc....mainly about poor Gerald guy, etc...
I do not think that mr. Gerald's past, present or future has anything to do with the effectivenes of these cd's!
Why would I care if a guy is shady or no, if his product brings amazing and good results and if what he is selling is able to help me reach my goals and improve the quality of my life???
I am one of those people that is seeing amazing improvements and exsqusite results by using his product/s and apparently tons of other people, if you reaD THE TESTIMONIALS!!!
pRETTY IMPRESSIVE, DON'T YOU AGREE?
You can contact all these people via e-mail and I doubt that you would find out that all of them/us are lying!
That itself speaks for itself, and I/we truly do not care did he come from France, Spain or Mars,...or anything else for that matter!!!
Anyways, try the product: it is money back guarantee,that is: if you do not like it, and when you try it, then we can really talk!
Ian, Therese....care to momment?!
So long...
Neala
oops...that was comment....not momment...
not to worry about the spelling, it is important that we "clear" this out of the way...
If possible...
Neala
Hi Neala,
Great! I am excited to hear that what you have listened to is having such a dramatically positive effect and there is no denying he has a very impressive array of email testimonials, not least from our very own Michael here. I WANT this to be true and always have. I'm truly happy if this is so. This is why I was so vociferous in my defence to both Mr O'Donnell and the poster named Linda, because all I was doing is to ask some questions regarding things I'd read. I thought what I was asking was perfectly alright and there were no 'hidden meanings' behind the things I asked. I wasn't accusing him of anything. It was simply a case of having read SOME negative press about him and wanting him to clear it up. My concern was that when everyone went crazy and started insinuating I was Satan (lol) that I immediately (and quite naturally) thought things were a bit fishy. I am nobody's fool and I do not like being spoken down to, so I replied again in what I thought was a reasonable manner.
In answer to your statement:
"I do not think that mr. Gerald’s past, present or future has anything to do with the effectivenes of these cd’s!"
Well, yes and no. Although people can and do fool themselves into believing what they wish - much like a UFO fanatic being sure that every light in the sky is ET come to say hello - the main thing is that you are seeing a positive difference and at the end of the day, that is all that counts. My concern (call me Mr Scrooge! lol) was that if the guy DID have a shady past, then I would not be convinced he was the genuine article and most certainly would not be willing to hand over hundreds of dollars! Do you follow MY reasoning? I don't think there's anything wrong with being cautious and asking for some straightforward answers and that's what I'd hoped for, not all this darkness and light crap.
For what its worth, the testimonials and YOUR post here have done more to convince me to test the CDs than Mr O'Donnell's own post. There is at least a money back guarantee after all!
I'll be putting my order in after lunch today and will report back here in a couple of months to tell you if I am a disciple or if I am gonna purchase a shotgun and go on a manhunt!!! lol
THANK YOU Mr "Scrooge"!
I am happy you'll try them and looking on the bright side: you really can get your money back, after all!
I can't wait to find out about your personal experience with this material, as everything really boils down to individual and very personal experience, as we are all unique and different!
Looking forward to further communication with you, regarding this matter, when the time comes...
Happy journey and HAPPY THOUGHTS to YOU!
So long....
neala
Hi Michael,
I have listened to your fantastic interviews with Mr. O'donnell so many times over the last two weeks. It is really comforting and a mind opener. Interestingly, it simply validates a lot of the recent insights I have been getting from the bible (All things are from the same basic material, have intelligence and are connected, humankind is made of light etc!...).
After I caught these revelations from the bible, I suddely started attracting other materials like Lynne McTaggart's book, The Field, and your interviews with Gerald. I know for a fact that I will attract much more materials and issues will be made clearer...
I'm looking at obtaining Gerald's CD's in the near future. I hope it will teach on going into the required state without falling asleep...I would also like to know more about The Matrix he talks about (although I am aware that this was the basic idea behind the action/sci-fi movie)
Please let me haveany additional interviews you conduct. Thanks.
excellent work, keep up the good job and share it with us.
Very interesting! It agree's greatly with some of the metaphysical things I have learned about or from past Saints and also makes sense from the stand point of modern physic's. Now if just had a forum that assigned scores to each program as to which things each course does best and wich types of people would learn best from each course. Seeing how their are so many differnt styles of teacing this would be of great value to all. Not so much a grade of which course is beter or best or such rather what each one does best. Since all of I am sure great programs.
I am looking to obtain his material as well but the price is just too high at this time. Seriously consider lowering your price you would sell a lot more product.
It would also be great if their was some discussion on what each course has in common since they must have a lot that is simalar and what makes each cousre different!
OOOPS!!!!!! SORRY for posting a link that had already been posted before, and to make matters worse I copied and pasted the whole thing... I should have read all the post before posting. (me and my lazyness)
Sorry again
Hi!,
Good day!,
Hello!,
HELLO!
This message is for MR IAN K
Hi, Mr Scrooge!
Hey, remember you said you will let me know how did you like Mr. O' Donnell's CD's,that you were planning to buy and try them out.... what do you think about the course?
Please, let me know!
Thanks.
neala
ciao
hi i was thinking of purchasing this and its really interesting but can't you get all these powers and enlightenment through yoga and Buddhism with meditation because these two claim to be the best because of thousands of years of being passed down and refined from monk to monk. while remote viewing is the same but far less refined and much newer from what i can see not gerald but the others lacking compassion and taking sort of a physics understanding to gain the powers for selfish reasons when it should be geared to selflessness. also would u consider edgar cayce a remote viewer too? i think he was
Gerald O'Donnell's courses are good for everyone. I understand that you do not wish to fork over money to a fraud and shyster, but this man in neither of these things. I am also a most critical person, and I even have had some communication with Mr O'Donnell, and feel neutral towards him, but his courses are exquisite and unique to anything I have ever come across.
I would, without reservation, reccommend everybody at least try the combination set of CDs on removte viewing and remote influencing. There is a great deal of wisdom within this course, besides which, they have the capability of making one feel physically and emotionally terrific.
Credentials??? I haven't a clue. All I can say is "the proof is in the pudding," and the "pudding" in this case is my own true enjoyment of this progream. Can it be fraudulent to create a course meant to better the human condition? Can it be wrong to send a message of universal love, and forgiveness, and to alert the world that most everyone is controlled by the media that is controlled by the goveernment aka international corporations. Is it wrong to suggest people to turn off the news which is nothing but a stream of blatant lies, is it wrong to cry out against all the ravaging of this planet by poluting the air, the oceans, underground A bombing of our beautiful world, and all the rest?
I do not necessarily agree with Mr O'Donnell characterizing this Ian as "dark" or something similar. In fact, I saw no need for Mr O'Donnell to defend himself. In my opinion he has no need to defend himself. Whatever he is in total, I do not know and i do not care, because what I DO know about him is that he is doing a public service for the world with his courses.
Also, i have noticed that O'Donnell is not very commercial like for instance Ed Dames is, who is a constant guest on that late night radio talk show "Coast to Coast AM" and he is there ad nauseum and he supposedly does have credentials that are verifiable, yet he couldnt even find that guy who crashed over Nevada, and had been dead wrong on all his remote viewing "readings." And, he charges a heck of a lot more for his courses, and he is so commercial and fails and fails and fails with all his remote viewing results.
So big deal one way or the other on O'Donnell's credentials. Whatever his credentials are, one of them is that he has the good of humanity at heart, and i am not a push over for internet scams or con artists.
Just get the course. You have nothing to lose if you dont agree with me after going through his course as he offers a money back guarantee i believe.
I think he is cool, just wish that Michael Jura had not taken me off his mailing list. I know exactly why he did, and so does he, NOT VERY NICE TO DO THAT, MICHAEL. I WONDER IF THIS POST WILL EVEN SHOW UP OR WILL BE DELETED. I have a feeling it will be deleted, due to you know who, right, Michael!
Cheers,
Emily
As JFK was said to have said in reference to certain drugs he was being given secretly: "I don't care if it's horse piss, it makes me feel [one helluva lot better than I would be feeling if I had to live without them]!"
Princess
Great stuff. I agrees with many others things I have learned in the past 2-3 years about Quantum Physics, that we live in a multiverse, that we are all One Mind living in a sea of energy that is always vibrating - The Law of Vibrations - that there are certain universal laws governeing our lives and that we actually can alter our reality if we start to THINK and live from the inside out. Also, much of what Gerald O. is saying is also being told by souls in Michael Newtons book - Journey of Souls. It also fits in with Gregg Bradens Divine Matrix and with the String and M theory of the universe. Facinating stuff. We just have to wake up just like Neo did in The Matrix to realize what is going on.
Got involved 12 yaers ago while living in S.New Mexico and
visited training center in Alamagordo. 7 years ago bought a
video training program.
Blend RV concepts / tools / etc .. with the Intuition Network
as a awarness hobby / interest.
Make the reality to fantasy and the fantasy will become reality. What do I mean by that?? I mean:
The best teachers are those who understand their perception ("sense") of the content and promote their abstract thoughts.
Alex Gabriel V.