Remote Viewing: Controversial Interview with Gerald O’Donnell — Listen for FREE Now!

Have you ever won­dered what it would be like to use the Mind’s Power to Remote Influence?

Using the Mind’s Power to Remote Influence

Remote Influ­enc­ing refers to a very advanced tech­nol­ogy, tran­scend­ing most other known meth­ods, by which one can pow­er­fully influ­ence thoughts and con­sen­sual real­ity by mind-power and inner energy alone.

The inter­view covers:

  • How you can then have all the abil­i­ties that man can think of made avail­able to YOU to inher­ently change your real­ity, just by chang­ing your belief sys­tem
  • Remote view­ing insights into the inner and outer world that explain tough top­ics like the after life, karma, rein­car­na­tion and orga­nized reli­gion in ways you’ve never heard before…
  • What is the best way to deal with a per­son or group and influ­ence it to a har­mo­nious outcome?

LISTEN TO YOUR INTERVIEW HERE

[audio:http://learnremoteviewing.s3.amazonaws.com/themindpowertoinfluence.mp3]

Click here to down­load your inter­view »

(To down­load, right click the link above and
choose “Save Tar­get As…” or “Save Link As…”)

What are your thoughts on tough top­ics like the after life, karma, rein­car­na­tion and orga­nized reli­gion?

Don’t for­get to leave your comment!

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

90 Responses to Remote Viewing: Controversial Interview with Gerald O’Donnell — Listen for FREE Now!
  1. Jairan
    June 5, 2008 | 5:48 am

    Hi There,

    Its a Good day for all of us !

    I believe Ger­ald is a “WayShower” in this time period. I’m not sure if he knows/believes that or not, but any­way there is a web­site that explans all about if you would allow him and oth­ers to goto. The web­site is=

    http://goldring.wetpaint.com/page/1-TheGame

    in the top left side cor­ner it says (WIKI Pages) start with #1-TheGame and go through the videos down the page then click on next video to con­tinue with the total understanding..

    I would Love to hear Gerald’s out­look on this web­site..
    Ger­ald call me about two weeks ago want­ing to know if I was a mem­ber or not„ my name in full is
    (Leonard Jairan Giles) liv­ing in Grapevine, Tx

    I myself don’t feel this was chance.….….

    Peace and Love to all

  2. Debora
    June 5, 2008 | 6:50 am

    Loved the inter­view! I have older cas­sette ver­sions of the Remote View­ing and the Remote Influ­enc­ing courses and am won­der­ing if there are any changes in the newer CD versions.

  3. MJ
    June 5, 2008 | 1:52 pm

    I loved the inter­view. I have lis­tened to it sev­eral times. When Ger­ald takes about releas­ing fear, is it all fear? I have fears that started way before I can remem­ber that have effected my life in untold ways, a few I have become aware of in recent years. Will releas­ing fear through your method release me from these threads that have long held me bound?

    I look fore­word to hear­ing the next inter­view! Great info!

  4. Nyasha
    June 5, 2008 | 3:30 pm

    Hello. The inter­view was really eye open­ing and blew my mind. My con­cern has been raised by another and I would be great­ful to get more info regard­ing this in that when you enter these other fre­quen­cies a whole lot of unde­sir­able ener­gies exist there as well, if you could ask him to explain if there are any vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties to look out for and how to be pro­tected from these.
    Oth­er­wise I am really excited about this course, It is the answer to the many ques­tions I have had for such a long time.

    Keep up the excel­lent work.

  5. Alice
    June 6, 2008 | 12:18 am

    This ques­tion was asked and I too would like an answer. Why do we expe­ri­ence fear, espe­cially when we ven­ture into the unknown mind. If all ends well in the Cre­ator any­way — why the con­stant fear? What is its purpose?

  6. Ian K
    June 6, 2008 | 3:45 am

    Wow! I can­not believe how you would cen­sor me like that, just because I wasn’t cream­ing my jeans over this Ger­ald guy like every­one else! All I did was what YOU ASKED in your email and that was to present a ques­tion to Mr O’Donnell and YOU removed it!!!! You MUST be gain­ing finan­cially from this or there is no way you would have done so. I was polite and all I did was to bring into focus some dubi­ous ques­tions regard­ing this fellow’s past. Here is the link again for the non-sheep out there:

    http://www.remoteviewer.org/remoteviewing/odonnel.htm

    And Michael, I would sug­gest you do NOT remove the post this time or not only will I con­tinue to repost under dif­fer­ent names, I will blacken YOUR name on all the forums out there. Sorry if this runs counter to any mon­e­tary incen­tives you’ve been offered by this O’Donnell guy, but I believe in truth, fair­ness and free­dom of speech. Maybe you should too.

  7. Gerald O'Donnell
    June 6, 2008 | 12:09 pm

    I almost find this funny. What a waste of energy the dark is!
    I a sure all of you face the same every day and know that the best way to deflect it is to look at it for what it is: an illu­sion and a test of strength and resolve.

    I am sorry that you even have to be exposed to such low energy stuff how­ever just for your sake as the role of dark­ness is always to attack light and instill doubt in our minds I feel obliged to there­fore clar­ify something:

    Remoteviewer.org is run and owned by a cer­tain Dane Spotts owner of a com­me­cial RV com­pany called TRV (PSITECH http://www.remoteviewing.com/)co-owned by the same guy and Joni Dou­rif. This site seems to be a way to pro­mote their wares, by spread­ing neg­a­tiv­ity using lies and false rumors about almost every­body else in the RV field who they feel is true competition.

    Don Spotts used to run Zygon inter­na­tional, inc.

    Remoteviewer.org is not an inde­pen­dent .org (orga­ni­za­tion) but very much a com­mer­cial site pur­pos­ing to gift “unbi­ased” info about known RVers and run by Don which does not bode well for his integrity.

    You can see this for your­selves by doing a WHOIS search on that domain name
    http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/results.jsp?domain=remoteviewer.org

    Domain ID:D31740069-LROR
    Domain Name:REMOTEVIEWER.ORG
    Cre­ated On:22-Jul-2000 05:02:32 UTC
    Last Updated On:23-Jun-2007 08:29:50 UTC
    Expi­ra­tion Date:22-Jul-2008 05:02:32 UTC
    Spon­sor­ing Registrar:eNom, Inc. (R39-LROR)
    Status:OK
    Reg­is­trant ID:ZD540-BR
    Reg­is­trant Name:dane spotts
    Reg­is­trant Organization:LifeQuest
    Reg­is­trant Street1:p.o. box 1444
    Reg­is­trant Street2:
    Reg­is­trant Street3:
    Reg­is­trant City:issaquah
    Reg­is­trant State/Province:WA
    Reg­is­trant Postal Code:98027
    Reg­is­trant Country:US

    Com­pe­ti­tion can be a won­der­ful thing and we wel­come it as long as the indi­vid­u­als involved are of a high moral fiber and cal­iber and care about One­ness instead of pro­mot­ing division.

    Much of the infor­ma­tion on that site is laced with per­sonal attacks and false­hood. The story planted about me and Buchanan is a flat lie. Period.

    To attack Michael who I find to be a true gen­tle­man and a very high soul is just a reflec­tion of where you come from.

    The issue is closed on my end. I have for­given you.

    I send you Love and Light and hope that it will blend well with your soul and bring you peace.

    Ger­ald

  8. Ariel K
    June 7, 2008 | 9:20 am

    In response to the above post by Ian K, I cam across this website:

    http://www.remoteviewinglight.com/html/buchanan.html

  9. shahrzad
    June 7, 2008 | 1:13 pm

    Hi, I really enjoyed.thanks.

  10. Sophia
    June 8, 2008 | 7:36 am

    After read­ing through all of the responses, it seems that there are ques­tions and fears that peo­ple have who have bought the Remote View­ing and Remote Influ­enc­ing CD’s. If Ger­ald O’Donnell doesn’t have a sup­port group for his cus­tomers, he should seri­ously con­sider mak­ing one available.

    Another point, Ger­ald needs to respond to the “bad press” that is on the inter­net about his back­ground and the validity/effectiveness of his training.

  11. shaley
    June 9, 2008 | 1:23 am

    I just wanted to know what ger­ald thinks about how we can heal illnesses…?

    Thank you :)

  12. Sheila
    June 9, 2008 | 10:53 am

    RE: Gerald’s post above, I won­der why Ger­ald views dark energy as “attack­ing”? Is it just his per­cep­tion of what is hap­pen­ing, or does he know it for certain?

    In my uni­verse, dark energy doesn’t attack, it oper­ates via inten­tion and attrac­tion. The word “attack” con­notes a good/evil aspect to me, which is a value judg­ment that is rel­a­tive to the perceiver.

    Does the dark energy behave dif­fer­ently when an emo­tion is placed upon an energy flow by the per­ceiver, rather than view­ing it as sim­ply energy? I think yes, it does. Because there is a rela­tion­ship between the energy and the per­ceiver (observer).

  13. Ian K
    June 11, 2008 | 4:13 pm

    Thank you very much for respond­ing Mr O’Donnell. If you’ll excuse me for a moment, I’ll respond to your com­ments in a sec­ond, but I’d first like to reply quickly to Ariel K. Ariel, the web­site you referred to is Ger­ald O’Donnell’s site or at least endorsed by him and the same one men­tioned by Lyn Buchanan in his cri­tique that I gave the link to. Lyn says this about it, “He responded by putting a huge and very slan­der­ous tyrade about me on his web site (it’s still there, if you want to see it”. Thank you any­way for try­ing to help out.

    Now, back to you Mr O’Donnell…

    While I appre­ci­ate you reply­ing, what you said was not really an answer to the points raised, was it? You gave what I like to call a ‘polit­i­cal answer’, which basi­cally means you spoke a lot but really didn’t say anything!

    You did what a lot of peo­ple do and that was to start using silly eso­teric imagery to define me — a per­son you do not know — as some­how evil and you say it in first sen­tence, in which you also say you almost find it funny. This implies that you are being con­de­scend­ing as well. You fail (or are scared) to appre­ci­ate that you are mak­ing a claim of huge pro­por­tions and you are try­ing to SELL that claim to us as poten­tial cus­tomers, so my ask­ing per­ti­nent ques­tions about your back­ground and your authen­tic­ity are not ‘dark’ any­thing, they are very rel­e­vant and you not answer­ing them straight out could eas­ily be per­ceived as hid­ing in the ‘dark’. Do you see this? I am not being nasty. Merely stat­ing facts which can be observed by any­one with crit­i­cal think­ing capabilities.

    This leads us onto the sub­ject of doubt. Doubt is one of the most essen­tial req­ui­sites of a think­ing human being. It sep­a­rates us from sheep. If you did not have ratio­nal doubt then you would be a very gullible and ingen­u­ous per­son. Doubt is the essence of ques­tion­ning and ques­tion­ning is why are now in the age of inter­net debates and no longer sit­ting in caves wor­ship­ping sticks. So for you to attack doubt as if it was some­thing bad then I’m afraid it is YOU who are endors­ing ‘dark energy’!

    Now, let us address the things in ques­tion again shall we? And let see if you can shed some LIGHT on them.

    First, you say: “The story planted about me and Buchanan is a flat lie. Period.” Ok. If it is it would appear you are now point­ing the fin­ger at Dane Spotts (who you started call­ing Don halfway through your reply. I won­der if I was the only one to find this strange and it makes me won­der about how accu­rate you are remote view­ing things unseen when you can’t even keep a guy’s name con­sis­tent!) & Joni Dou­rif as per­pe­tra­tors of the lie, and if so then how come you give such a vir­u­lent tirade against Mr Buchanan here?:

    http://www.remoteviewinglight.com/html/buchanan.html

    (This is the same link as given by Ariel K, above). You seem to be shift­ing blame around. I’m sorry if this isn’t so, but thats how it appears. Kinda like you are keep­ing peo­ple ‘in the DARK’. ;-)

    So, want­ing to keep every­thing out of the shad­ows, answer these please with a sim­ple yes or no:

    1. Did you write to Mr Buchanan and tell him you were in the same mil­i­tary unit as him?

    2. Did you threaten to sue him?

    3. I ask you to com­ment on all the points raised in the 4th para­graph on that site — the one about ‘Jason’.

    Remem­ber, that if you don’t answer with yes or no, then it will be con­strued as a SHADY answer. Keep in mind too that if you say yes or no and its a lie and Mr Buchanan or oth­ers has evi­dence to the con­trary, then YOU could be sued for libel. Hush… if you are a light bringer then you have noth­ing to fear, right?

    Ok,I will no longer talk in such child­ish terms. I just can­not stand peo­ple who play silly word games and if you answer again then I would appre­ci­ate that you cor­re­spond in plain Eng­lish and keep your flow­ery lan­guage for peo­ple who like to sit open mouthed at the feet of mas­ters — enlight­ened or otherwise.

    I’ll fin­ish up by say­ing (which I know you won’t believe, but nev­er­the­less is true) that all of the things I have asked ARE JUST QUESTIONS. I do not know you per­son­ally or any of the other remote view­ing celebri­ties. All I want is straight talk and no bull­shit. I am NOT going to by any­thing ped­dled by a shys­ter and so I demand ope­ness. Surely some­one as sup­pos­edly human­i­tar­ian as your­self under­stands this need, no?

    As for my com­ment against Michael, I said this because my first post was not there when I came back to check. I either over­looked it (don’t think so) or it has re-emerged since I came back again. If it is the for­mer, then I fully apol­o­gise to Michael. My ques­tions to you still stand though and I would like answers.

    Please see this as the inquiry it is, for I assure you it is noth­ing more than that. When it comes to ‘light bringers’ you will be hard pressed to find any­one more com­mit­ted than I for this cause.

    Best regards,
    Ian K

  14. Linda Davidson
    June 11, 2008 | 11:32 pm

    “I send you Love and Light and hope that it will blend well with your soul and bring you peace.

    Ger­ald”

    Looks like it did not blend in… Ian K., for God sake, this is annoy­ing! I just don’t under­stand why peo­ple like you can’t sleep at night when some­one is suc­cess­ful, and have to keep on bring­ing neg­a­tiv­ity dri­ven by… jeal­ousy may be? What I sence from your posts are really low vibs.
    And this: “And Michael, I would sug­gest you do NOT remove the post this time or not only will I con­tinue to repost under dif­fer­ent names, I will blacken YOUR name on all the forums out there”, speaks of WHO YOU REALLY ARE and your apol­ogy does not change it. Please do your­self and peo­ple here a favor — QUIT IT!

    Mr. O’Donnell, I enjoyed both of your inter­views — amaz­ing infor­ma­tion!
    My grat­i­tude to you and Michael. Great job!

  15. Ian K
    June 12, 2008 | 4:28 am

    Oops! In my third to last para­graph, I said, “I am NOT going to by any­thing ped­dled by a shys­ter”.… I meant ‘BUY’, not ‘by’. Sorry!

  16. NEALA from NY
    June 12, 2008 | 5:56 am

    com­mon’ peo­ple, enough of this stuff…back and forth.…you Mr. smart go directly to Ger­ald, do not use this site, which has totally dif­fer­ent mean­ing and rea­son for exsisting…to through stones at each other…endless who said what, who is right, who is not, who is a saint and who sinner…to use your strong, plain amer­i­can lan­guage: enough of this bull­shit!
    find his e-mail address and spit on each other as much as you want and do not use this or other help­ful posts to indulge in your per­sonal opin­ions about cer­tain peo­ple or for any angry, upset­ing “revenge­ful pur­poses!
    GOT IT?
    Michael, you should stop post­ing the rest of this “ten­nis mach” on your site…that is some­thing between them, the rest of us want to con­cen­trate on more use­ful and close to the spe­cific sub­ject stuff…!
    Enough with this annoy­ing sharade!~

  17. Zori
    June 12, 2008 | 9:30 pm

    Great inter­view, and Thanks (-:

  18. Michelle Feldman
    June 15, 2008 | 7:42 am

    Michael: while I appre­ci­ate your bring­ing the work of these remote review­ers to the atten­tion of the pub­lic, your enthu­si­as­tic and seem­ingly uncrit­i­cal endorse­ment of both Ed Danes and Ger­ald O’Donnell leaves a lot of ques­tions unan­swered. If some of the sites I’ve reviewed are to be believed, Ed has a mis­er­able record as a prog­nos­ti­ca­tor and has fraud­u­lently rep­re­sented his back­ground. Appar­ently, accord­ing to Buchanan, Ger­ald is no bet­ter. Now this could sim­ply be cut-throat com­pe­ti­tion among pro­fes­sion­als, but these charges and counter charges would need to be fully addressed and laid to rest before any grown up with a rea­son­ably crit­i­cal mind could com­fort­ably buy their courses on remote view­ing. Michael, you request that prospec­tive cus­tomers post their ques­tions via your blog, but I can see that Ger­ald actu­ally refuses to answer some legit­i­mate inquiries and in fact attacks those who ask these ques­tions. Why doesn’t this set off any of YOUR alarm bells? I mean, you’re read­ing these posts too. Frankly, to my way of think­ing, it hurts the Silva brand to be asso­ci­ated with any­thing that even remotely smacks of poten­tial dis­hon­esty and huck­ster­ism. Peo­ple who are telling the truth and can back it up never have to dodge ques­tions. Surely we all know that?

  19. Therese
    June 15, 2008 | 10:49 am

    I’ve lis­tened to both inter­views, and appre­ci­ate the oppor­tu­nity for expan­sion. I am intrigued by some of the denser, seem­ingly stuck vibra­tory energy offered by some of the respon­dents here.….why the anger.…or maybe this is bet­ter stated as fear? If some­thing does not res­onate, then be trans­par­ent to it. And if there’s a need to be self-righteous, to den­i­grate due to fear, or for your own real­ity to be heard, then do so. And it is received with Grat­i­tude, and great Com­pas­sion. But per­haps offer­ing it once is enough.

    I’ve done some research, as I have stud­ied the courses that Ger­ald offers, and wanted to see what is out there on some of these repeated ques­tions. I came across this site: http://web.archive.org/web/19990221134525/www.crviewer.com/xgeraldo.htm
    in which Mr. Buchanan states: “Mr. O’Donnell — in his ini­tial email — was up front about the fact that he was not in the US military’s project. Read­ing his web page, I did not get the impres­sion that he was quite so clear about that. In short, he may have been a mem­ber of some other country’s project, but was never a part of the US government’s project in any way.”

    So that answers that ques­tion. I would offer one final thought that has been stated by many beau­ti­ful beings on the ques­tions we should ask our­selves to deter­mine if we should say some­thing. If we answer “no” to any one of them, it is gen­tly rec­om­mended that we remain silent:
    1. Is it true?
    2. Is it nec­es­sary?
    3. Is it kind?

    It may seem so chal­leng­ing, and yet it is one of the most sim­ple and lov­ing acts of Creation.

    I wish you all a day over­flow­ing with kindness.

  20. Ian K
    June 17, 2008 | 4:34 am

    To Linda,

    I’m sorry you have such dif­fi­culty mis­tak­ing crit­i­cal think­ing with neg­a­tiv­ity. Just because some­one uses the words such as ‘peace & love’ it means noth­ing. If you read the rest of his reply you would have seen that there was a thinly dis­guised accu­sa­tion. When I read yours it is even thin­ner! lol Maybe both of you should take up this ‘love and light’ stuff that you both preach but nei­ther really pos­sess. Or per­haps bet­ter still all I need is to set up a web­site and claim I can trans­form dog crap into piles of gold and for $300 for you to come rush­ing out to buy it and defend me if any­one should ques­tion my claims!

    Your post was summed up in the words, “I just don’t under­stand”. Clearly.

    More quotes of yours with my responses:
    “and have to keep on bring­ing neg­a­tiv­ity” — I didn’t. I asked valid ques­tions. Mr O’Donnell was the one who started mak­ing it child­ish and bring­ing in dark and light, not me.

    “speaks of WHO YOU REALLY ARE and your apol­ogy does not change it. Please do your­self and peo­ple here a favor — QUIT IT!” — Really? 1. I will not quit any­thing because some silly per­son with the inabil­ity to under­stand rea­son tells me to. And 2. My apol­ogy was gen­uine. I hon­estly thought I had been cen­sored and as this is not the case, then I AM truly sorry to Michael. The guy is being very nice and allow­ing us to lis­ten to these men. I have never said any­thing against that. What I do ques­tion is whether these peo­ple are truly capa­ble of doing what they say. From what I have seen, the answer is a big NO. This isn’t neg­a­tive, its a fact, just like day fol­lows night. This is not pos­i­tive or neg­a­tive either, it is sim­ply so. I can’t help if you can’t see it.

    And last but not least: “Mr. O’Donnell, I enjoyed both of your inter­views — amaz­ing infor­ma­tion!” — Belief with­out ques­tion­ing is why the world is in the state it is, i.e. DARK. Sorry Linda, but it is you and peo­ple like you who are the cause of it.
    ———————————-
    Therese,

    Thank you for the link. What I would like though is for Mr O’Donnell to explain why if all of this bad blood between him and Buchanan is man­u­fac­tured, then why does the link I gave in my last post still exist with HIS name on the copy­right at the bot­tom? This sug­gests endorse­ment of the state­ments con­tained therein.

    As for your own ques­tion (a nice, sneaky, “Shut up Ian”, if ever I’ve heard one! lol), you said:

    “If we answer “no” to any one of them, it is gen­tly rec­om­mended that we remain silent:
    1. Is it true?
    2. Is it nec­es­sary?
    3. Is it kind?”

    Answers: 1. We do not know. Thus the need for ques­tion­ing in the first place and not tak­ing things on mere belief.
    2. Absolutely. We are try­ing to estab­lish whether the inter­vie­wee is truly what he says he is or just a char­la­tan. Remem­ber the mag­ni­tude of the claims here folks. I’m sorry, but it is quite unset­tling how peo­ple just accept so blindly. Remem­ber too that he is SELLING some­thing. If you wish to part with hard earned cash with­out first estab­lish­ing the verac­ity of the claimant then go right ahead. Be all light and lov­ing… and out of pocket! ;-)
    3. Lastly, the most impor­tant ques­tion of all. YES, my ques­tions ARE kind, for I am try­ing to do what is best and find out what is true (your ques­tion num­ber 1!). What seems to have escaped Linda is that ques­tion­ing does not = BAD. I have a ques­tion of my own and I hope you all under­stand the mean­ing: Would you pre­fer to have a doc­tor who told you that every­thing was fine and here were some pills to dull the pain or have another one who told you that you had a rup­tured gall blad­der and needed painful surgery straight away? Well? Who is the kinder, lighter, lov­ing, soul­ful one? The softly softly one or the one telling you how it is and who could save your life? I ask you all to pon­der my state­ments before com­ing back with some down­right NASTY replies. Thank you.

    Ian.

  21. Betchad
    June 17, 2008 | 6:01 am

    Therese,

    You too are being very self right­eous! What that guy was say­ing makes a lot of sense and the link you show here pretty much con­demns Ger­ald O for good. Did you read it properly?

  22. NEALA from NY
    June 19, 2008 | 12:18 pm

    OK
    I hear you peo­ple hav­ing valid and some­what sen­si­ble dis­cu­sions about these courses, etc.…mainly about poor Ger­ald guy, etc…
    I do not think that mr. Gerald’s past, present or future has any­thing to do with the effec­tivenes of these cd’s!
    Why would I care if a guy is shady or no, if his prod­uct brings amaz­ing and good results and if what he is sell­ing is able to help me reach my goals and improve the qual­ity of my life???
    I am one of those peo­ple that is see­ing amaz­ing improve­ments and exsqusite results by using his product/s and appar­ently tons of other peo­ple, if you reaD THE TESTIMONIALS!!!
    pRETTY IMPRESSIVE, DON’T YOU AGREE?
    You can con­tact all these peo­ple via e-mail and I doubt that you would find out that all of them/us are lying!
    That itself speaks for itself, and I/we truly do not care did he come from France, Spain or Mars,…or any­thing else for that mat­ter!!!
    Any­ways, try the prod­uct: it is money back guarantee,that is: if you do not like it, and when you try it, then we can really talk!

    Ian, Therese.…care to mom­ment?!
    So long…
    Neala

  23. NEALA from NY
    June 19, 2008 | 12:34 pm

    oops…that was comment.…not mom­ment…
    not to worry about the spelling, it is impor­tant that we “clear” this out of the way…
    If pos­si­ble…
    Neala

  24. Ian K
    June 21, 2008 | 4:01 am

    Hi Neala,

    Great! I am excited to hear that what you have lis­tened to is hav­ing such a dra­mat­i­cally pos­i­tive effect and there is no deny­ing he has a very impres­sive array of email tes­ti­mo­ni­als, not least from our very own Michael here. I WANT this to be true and always have. I’m truly happy if this is so. This is why I was so vocif­er­ous in my defence to both Mr O’Donnell and the poster named Linda, because all I was doing is to ask some ques­tions regard­ing things I’d read. I thought what I was ask­ing was per­fectly alright and there were no ‘hid­den mean­ings’ behind the things I asked. I wasn’t accus­ing him of any­thing. It was sim­ply a case of hav­ing read SOME neg­a­tive press about him and want­ing him to clear it up. My con­cern was that when every­one went crazy and started insin­u­at­ing I was Satan (lol) that I imme­di­ately (and quite nat­u­rally) thought things were a bit fishy. I am nobody’s fool and I do not like being spo­ken down to, so I replied again in what I thought was a rea­son­able manner.

    In answer to your statement:

    “I do not think that mr. Gerald’s past, present or future has any­thing to do with the effec­tivenes of these cd’s!”

    Well, yes and no. Although peo­ple can and do fool them­selves into believ­ing what they wish — much like a UFO fanatic being sure that every light in the sky is ET come to say hello — the main thing is that you are see­ing a pos­i­tive dif­fer­ence and at the end of the day, that is all that counts. My con­cern (call me Mr Scrooge! lol) was that if the guy DID have a shady past, then I would not be con­vinced he was the gen­uine arti­cle and most cer­tainly would not be will­ing to hand over hun­dreds of dol­lars! Do you fol­low MY rea­son­ing? I don’t think there’s any­thing wrong with being cau­tious and ask­ing for some straight­for­ward answers and that’s what I’d hoped for, not all this dark­ness and light crap.

    For what its worth, the tes­ti­mo­ni­als and YOUR post here have done more to con­vince me to test the CDs than Mr O’Donnell’s own post. There is at least a money back guar­an­tee after all! ;-)

    I’ll be putting my order in after lunch today and will report back here in a cou­ple of months to tell you if I am a dis­ci­ple or if I am gonna pur­chase a shot­gun and go on a man­hunt!!! lol

  25. NEALA from NY
    June 23, 2008 | 6:04 am

    THANK YOU Mr “Scrooge”!
    I am happy you’ll try them and look­ing on the bright side: you really can get your money back, after all!
    I can’t wait to find out about your per­sonal expe­ri­ence with this mate­r­ial, as every­thing really boils down to indi­vid­ual and very per­sonal expe­ri­ence, as we are all unique and dif­fer­ent!
    Look­ing for­ward to fur­ther com­mu­ni­ca­tion with you, regard­ing this mat­ter, when the time comes…
    Happy jour­ney and HAPPY THOUGHTS to YOU!
    So long.…
    neala

  26. Sam
    July 3, 2008 | 8:16 am

    Hi Michael,

    I have lis­tened to your fan­tas­tic inter­views with Mr. O’donnell so many times over the last two weeks. It is really com­fort­ing and a mind opener. Inter­est­ingly, it sim­ply val­i­dates a lot of the recent insights I have been get­ting from the bible (All things are from the same basic mate­r­ial, have intel­li­gence and are con­nected, humankind is made of light etc!…).

    After I caught these rev­e­la­tions from the bible, I sud­dely started attract­ing other mate­ri­als like Lynne McTaggart’s book, The Field, and your inter­views with Ger­ald. I know for a fact that I will attract much more mate­ri­als and issues will be made clearer…

    I’m look­ing at obtain­ing Gerald’s CD’s in the near future. I hope it will teach on going into the required state with­out falling asleep…I would also like to know more about The Matrix he talks about (although I am aware that this was the basic idea behind the action/sci-fi movie)

    Please let me haveany addi­tional inter­views you con­duct. Thanks.

  27. Parastoo Hosseini
    July 10, 2008 | 10:51 am

    excel­lent work, keep up the good job and share it with us.

  28. John
    July 18, 2008 | 11:38 am

    Very inter­est­ing! It agree’s greatly with some of the meta­phys­i­cal things I have learned about or from past Saints and also makes sense from the stand point of mod­ern physic’s. Now if just had a forum that assigned scores to each pro­gram as to which things each course does best and wich types of peo­ple would learn best from each course. See­ing how their are so many dif­fernt styles of teac­ing this would be of great value to all. Not so much a grade of which course is beter or best or such rather what each one does best. Since all of I am sure great programs.

    I am look­ing to obtain his mate­r­ial as well but the price is just too high at this time. Seri­ously con­sider low­er­ing your price you would sell a lot more product.

    It would also be great if their was some dis­cus­sion on what each course has in com­mon since they must have a lot that is simalar and what makes each cousre different!

  29. noname
    July 25, 2008 | 12:25 am

    OOOPS!!!!!! SORRY for post­ing a link that had already been posted before, and to make mat­ters worse I copied and pasted the whole thing… I should have read all the post before post­ing. (me and my lazyness)

    Sorry again

  30. name
    August 31, 2008 | 6:04 pm

    Hi!,

  31. name
    August 31, 2008 | 8:06 pm

    Good day!,

  32. name
    August 31, 2008 | 9:57 pm

    Hello!,

  33. NEALA from NY
    September 5, 2008 | 2:49 pm

    HELLO!

    This mes­sage is for MR IAN K
    Hi, Mr Scrooge!
    Hey, remem­ber you said you will let me know how did you like Mr. O’ Donnell’s CD’s,that you were plan­ning to buy and try them out.… what do you think about the course?
    Please, let me know!
    Thanks.
    neala
    ciao

  34. andrew
    September 27, 2008 | 6:04 pm

    hi i was think­ing of pur­chas­ing this and its really inter­est­ing but can’t you get all these pow­ers and enlight­en­ment through yoga and Bud­dhism with med­i­ta­tion because these two claim to be the best because of thou­sands of years of being passed down and refined from monk to monk. while remote view­ing is the same but far less refined and much newer from what i can see not ger­ald but the oth­ers lack­ing com­pas­sion and tak­ing sort of a physics under­stand­ing to gain the pow­ers for self­ish rea­sons when it should be geared to self­less­ness. also would u con­sider edgar cayce a remote viewer too? i think he was

  35. Emily
    October 1, 2008 | 12:39 am

    Ger­ald O’Donnell’s courses are good for every­one. I under­stand that you do not wish to fork over money to a fraud and shys­ter, but this man in nei­ther of these things. I am also a most crit­i­cal per­son, and I even have had some com­mu­ni­ca­tion with Mr O’Donnell, and feel neu­tral towards him, but his courses are exquis­ite and unique to any­thing I have ever come across.

    I would, with­out reser­va­tion, rec­c­om­mend every­body at least try the com­bi­na­tion set of CDs on removte view­ing and remote influ­enc­ing. There is a great deal of wis­dom within this course, besides which, they have the capa­bil­ity of mak­ing one feel phys­i­cally and emo­tion­ally terrific.

    Cre­den­tials??? I haven’t a clue. All I can say is “the proof is in the pud­ding,” and the “pud­ding” in this case is my own true enjoy­ment of this pro­gream. Can it be fraud­u­lent to cre­ate a course meant to bet­ter the human con­di­tion? Can it be wrong to send a mes­sage of uni­ver­sal love, and for­give­ness, and to alert the world that most every­one is con­trolled by the media that is con­trolled by the gov­eern­ment aka inter­na­tional cor­po­ra­tions. Is it wrong to sug­gest peo­ple to turn off the news which is noth­ing but a stream of bla­tant lies, is it wrong to cry out against all the rav­aging of this planet by polut­ing the air, the oceans, under­ground A bomb­ing of our beau­ti­ful world, and all the rest?

    I do not nec­es­sar­ily agree with Mr O’Donnell char­ac­ter­iz­ing this Ian as “dark” or some­thing sim­i­lar. In fact, I saw no need for Mr O’Donnell to defend him­self. In my opin­ion he has no need to defend him­self. What­ever he is in total, I do not know and i do not care, because what I DO know about him is that he is doing a pub­lic ser­vice for the world with his courses.

    Also, i have noticed that O’Donnell is not very com­mer­cial like for instance Ed Dames is, who is a con­stant guest on that late night radio talk show “Coast to Coast AM” and he is there ad nau­seum and he sup­pos­edly does have cre­den­tials that are ver­i­fi­able, yet he couldnt even find that guy who crashed over Nevada, and had been dead wrong on all his remote view­ing “read­ings.” And, he charges a heck of a lot more for his courses, and he is so com­mer­cial and fails and fails and fails with all his remote view­ing results.

    So big deal one way or the other on O’Donnell’s cre­den­tials. What­ever his cre­den­tials are, one of them is that he has the good of human­ity at heart, and i am not a push over for inter­net scams or con artists.

    Just get the course. You have noth­ing to lose if you dont agree with me after going through his course as he offers a money back guar­an­tee i believe.

    I think he is cool, just wish that Michael Jura had not taken me off his mail­ing list. I know exactly why he did, and so does he, NOT VERY NICE TO DO THAT, MICHAEL. I WONDER IF THIS POST WILL EVEN SHOW UP OR WILL BE DELETED. I have a feel­ing it will be deleted, due to you know who, right, Michael!

    Cheers,

    Emily

  36. Princess
    October 1, 2008 | 1:16 am

    As JFK was said to have said in ref­er­ence to cer­tain drugs he was being given secretly: “I don’t care if it’s horse piss, it makes me feel [one hel­luva lot bet­ter than I would be feel­ing if I had to live with­out them]!”

    Princess

  37. Camillo
    May 21, 2009 | 8:05 pm

    Great stuff. I agrees with many oth­ers things I have learned in the past 2–3 years about Quan­tum Physics, that we live in a mul­ti­verse, that we are all One Mind liv­ing in a sea of energy that is always vibrat­ing — The Law of Vibra­tions — that there are cer­tain uni­ver­sal laws gov­erne­ing our lives and that we actu­ally can alter our real­ity if we start to THINK and live from the inside out. Also, much of what Ger­ald O. is say­ing is also being told by souls in Michael New­tons book — Jour­ney of Souls. It also fits in with Gregg Bradens Divine Matrix and with the String and M the­ory of the uni­verse. Faci­nat­ing stuff. We just have to wake up just like Neo did in The Matrix to real­ize what is going on.

  38. LARS
    September 18, 2009 | 2:37 pm

    Got involved 12 yaers ago while liv­ing in S.New Mex­ico and
    vis­ited train­ing cen­ter in Ala­m­agordo. 7 years ago bought a
    video train­ing pro­gram.
    Blend RV con­cepts / tools / etc .. with the Intu­ition Net­work
    as a awar­ness hobby / interest.

  39. Alex Gabriel Vu
    January 19, 2010 | 3:10 pm

    Make the real­ity to fan­tasy and the fan­tasy will become real­ity. What do I mean by that?? I mean:
    The best teach­ers are those who under­stand their per­cep­tion (“sense”) of the con­tent and pro­mote their abstract thoughts.

    Alex Gabriel V.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks
  1. The Core Secrets of Remote Viewing Revealed — Learn Remote Viewing
Leave a Reply


Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://blog.learnremoteviewing.com/2008/05/21/remote-viewing-controversial-interview/trackback/