Remote Viewing — Part of a Greater, Synchronized Universe?

“The Syn­chro­nized Uni­verse is a well-written and excit­ing pre­sen­ta­tion of the lat­est sci­en­tific evi­dence prov­ing the exis­tence of the para­nor­mal. Swanson’s sug­ges­tions about how present physics can be mod­i­fied to under­stand and explain some of these strange phe­nom­ena may go a long way to heal­ing the ancient split between sci­ence and spir­i­tu­al­ity. The impli­ca­tions of this book are far-reaching.”

–Brad Steiger, author of Mys­ter­ies of Space and Time.

A New Sci­en­tific Rev­o­lu­tion is qui­etly underway…

Blonde Ambition 3

A new book, The Syn­chro­nized Uni­verse, reveals that the tapes­try of mod­ern sci­ence is show­ing a few tatters…There are many things mod­ern sci­ence can­not explain, and yet they occur any­way. This includes phe­nom­ena in the “hard sci­ences” as well as in the para­nor­mal. These effects are now being proven in the lab­o­ra­tory, even though they defy present sci­en­tific the­ory. These unfold­ing mys­ter­ies point the way to a new, deeper sci­ence, a sci­ence which no longer denies spirit and con­scious­ness, but acknowl­edges and embraces them.

The Mys­tery Unfolds…A New Fron­tier Emerges

In the past three decades sci­en­tific evi­dence has accu­mu­lated show­ing that the present sci­en­tific par­a­digm is bro­ken. In the hard sciences:

1. DARK MATTER

…of an unknown form makes up most of the mat­ter of the uni­verse. This mat­ter is not pre­dicted by the stan­dard physics mod­els. The so-called “The­ory of Every­thing” does not pre­dict and does not under­stand what this sub­stance is.

2. THE LAW OF GRAVITY

…appears to be seri­ously bro­ken. Exper­i­ments by Saxl and Allais found that Fou­cault pen­du­lums veer off in strange direc­tions dur­ing solar eclipses. Inter­plan­e­tary NASA satel­lites are show­ing per­sis­tent errors in tra­jec­tory. Nei­ther of these is explained or pre­dicted by the stan­dard the­ory of grav­ity known as Einstein’s Gen­eral Relativity.

3. COLD FUSION.

The Cold Fusion phe­nom­e­non vio­lates physics as we under­stand it, and yet it has been dupli­cated in var­i­ous forms in over 500 lab­o­ra­to­ries around the world. Recent stud­ies by the Elec­tric Power Research Insti­tute, a large non-profit research orga­ni­za­tion funded by the nation’s power com­pa­nies, found that Cold Fusion works. A recent Navy study also ver­i­fied the real­ity of Cold Fusion, and the orig­i­nal MIT study which sup­pos­edly dis­proved Cold Fusion has been found to have doc­tored its data. Present day physics has no expla­na­tion for how it works, but it does work.

4. CHARGE CLUSTERS.

Under cer­tain con­di­tions, bil­lions of elec­trons can “stick together” in close prox­im­ity, despite the law of elec­tro­mag­net­ism that like charges repel. Charge clus­ters are small, one mil­lionth of a meter in diam­e­ter, and are com­posed of tens or hun­dreds of bil­lions of elec­trons. They should fly apart at enor­mous speed, but they do not. This indi­cates that our laws of elec­tro­mag­net­ism are miss­ing some­thing important.

5. COSMOLOGY.

Quasars, which are sup­posed to be the most dis­tant astro­nom­i­cal objects in the sky, are often found con­nected to nearby galax­ies by jets of gas. This sug­gests that they may not be as far away as pre­vi­ously thought, and their red shifts are due to some other, more unusual physics which is not yet fully understood.

6. SPEED OF LIGHT

…once thought unbreak­able, has been exceeded in sev­eral recent exper­i­ments. Our notion of what is pos­si­ble in terms of prop­a­ga­tion speed has been chang­ing as a result. Cer­tain phe­nom­ena, such as solar dis­tur­bances on the sun which take more than eight min­utes to be vis­i­ble on the earth, are reg­is­tered instan­ta­neously on the acupunc­ture points of instru­mented sub­jects. Acupunc­ture points appar­ently respond to solar events by some other force which trav­els through space at a much higher speed than light.

This cov­ers just a few of the more glar­ing anom­alies in the “hard sci­ences.” Evi­dence has also accu­mu­lated in the lab­o­ra­tory that many para­nor­mal effects are real, and can be ver­i­fied and stud­ied sci­en­tif­i­cally. Among these are the following:

7. ESP.

Large-scale exper­i­ments by the Prince­ton PEAR Lab as well as other lab­o­ra­to­ries have proven that ESP is a real, sta­tis­ti­cally ver­i­fi­able sci­en­tific phe­nom­e­non. Thou­sands of exper­i­ments have been con­ducted with dozens of sub­jects, which demon­strate that this form of com­mu­ni­ca­tion is real, and that it does not weaken mea­sur­ably with dis­tance. This makes it unlike any known phys­i­cal force.

8. PSYCHOKINESIS, OR MIND OVER MATTER.

The abil­ity to exert psy­chic force over objects at a dis­tance has also been demon­strated in large-scale exper­i­ments. Even over dis­tances of thou­sands of miles, the behav­ior of cer­tain machines, called REGs for Ran­dom Event Gen­er­a­tors, have been altered by the inten­tion, or the psy­chic force of a dis­tant per­son. The odds that these effects are real, and not due to chance, is now mea­sured in bil­lions to one. In other words, this phe­nom­e­non is real.

9. REMOTE VIEWING.

The Amer­i­can mil­i­tary con­ducted a secret remote view­ing pro­gram for almost two decades. It was sup­ported because it worked, and evi­dence of its suc­cess has now become pub­lic. The remote view­ers have demon­strated that it is pos­si­ble to view “tar­gets” which are remote in space and time. In many cases details which were unavail­able any other way were acquired by the view­ers. Rig­or­ous sta­tis­ti­cal exper­i­ments have con­firmed that remote view­ing has accu­racy far above chance, and rep­re­sents a real phe­nom­e­non which defies present science.

10. TIME AND PROPHECY.

One unusual aspect of ESP, Remote View­ing and Psy­choki­ne­sis is that “time” doesn’t seem to mat­ter. One can exert an influ­ence or acquire infor­ma­tion in the past and in the future, almost as eas­ily as in the present. In con­ven­tional physics, the order of events is very impor­tant, but in the realm of psy­chic phe­nom­ena there seems to be a flex­i­bil­ity to move in time that defies cur­rent physics.

11. OUT-OF-BODY EXPERIENCE.

Exper­i­ments have been per­formed which show that, dur­ing some out-of-body expe­ri­ences, the “astral body” or cen­ter of con­scious­ness of the indi­vid­ual can be detected at remote loca­tions. When indi­vid­u­als go “out of body” and focus their con­scious­ness at another loca­tion, phys­i­cal dis­tur­bances have been mea­sured at that remote loca­tion. These include anom­alous light, elec­tri­cal, mag­netic and other phys­i­cal forces which indi­cate the “astral body” some­times has phys­i­cally mea­sur­able properties.

12. GHOSTS.

Mod­ern sci­en­tific ghost hunters use mag­netic, elec­tri­cal, opti­cal and ther­mal sen­sors when they sur­vey sup­pos­edly haunted sites. In hun­dreds of cases, tech­ni­cally trained researchers have found mea­sur­able phys­i­cal anom­alies when ghosts are said to be present. Although some peo­ple have claimed to see ghosts, and many have reported anom­alous cold spots and described a strange chill on their skin, mod­ern ghost hunters have shown that unusual mag­netic fields and strong volt­ages also occur in these same haunted loca­tions. Unusual orbs have been pho­tographed at the same time that mag­netic and elec­tri­cal dis­tur­bances are mea­sured. None of these can be explained by con­ven­tional science.

These are just a few of the areas in which sci­ence is dis­cov­er­ing very real, phys­i­cal and mea­sur­able effects which vio­late present sci­ence. The book The Syn­chro­nized Uni­verse describes this evi­dence in non-technical lan­guage, with many pic­tures, illus­tra­tions, graphs and ref­er­ences. It also shows how our present sci­ence can be expanded to begin to under­stand these mys­ter­ies.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

2 Responses to Remote Viewing — Part of a Greater, Synchronized Universe?
  1. brant
    May 30, 2008 | 1:20 pm

    hmmm– I went on a view. the seen was moist damp could hear the rush­ing noises. a per­son was injured– had taken a fall. it was life threat­en­ing– My minds eye per­cieved a fella –calmly smokin a cig­a­rette not to far away from where this injured per­son was lay­ing– one per­son was lay­ing down the other was lean­ing against a wall(solid struc­ture) I (my mind yelled for him to get help for this injured per­son in front of us) I yelled again to bearly get his atten­sion– he put out his cig­a­rette and moved away– lookin my direc­tion as if some­thing was weird where i was. He was totally dis­con­nected from the injured party . Did he exist in the same place at at a dif­fer­ent time? was he a gohst or spirit of a per­son. I kinda get that per­cep­tion– there was another per­son up the way form this guy but I never caught his interaction.

    Im kinda curi­ous too– my minds eye has trav­eld to a cou­ple of places on our planet far away– am i astro trav­el­ing? is this an out of body

  2. George Bryant
    June 3, 2008 | 8:26 pm

    Hi,

    I pur­chased Ger­ald O’Donnell’s RV/RI pack­age over the week­end and am extremely excited to begin train­ing. As a result, I’ve begun look­ing into any­thing I can find on Remote View­ing. I stum­bled across this blog and enjoyed the 25 minute piece on the search for Christina. How­ever, I am a bit skep­ti­cal of this par­tic­u­lar expe­ri­ence for the fol­low­ing reasons:

    1) The veg­e­ta­tion lay­ing on top of the mat­tress had been cut down and placed there strate­gi­cally. I bring this up only because the limbs were fresh and the leaves were still green. I would dis­miss this obser­va­tion if Christina’s dis­ap­pear­ance were only a few months/years old (per­haps the killer revis­ited the site to ensure that the evi­dence remained concealed?)…but 30 years after the fact?

    2) The pres­ence of a denim jacket near the scene. While the tag on the jacket may have read 70’s, how could the fab­ric be in such out­stand­ing con­di­tion given 30 years of envi­ron­men­tal pres­sure? Addi­tion­ally, the video stated that the river over­flowed on a reg­u­lar basis. If inves­ti­ga­tors were wor­ried about a buried body wash­ing away, how could they over­look the fact that the jacket was still in place?

    Please do not mis­un­der­stand this mes­sage. I am not try­ing to be a jerk. Again, I recently pur­chased Ger­ald O’Donnell’s Remote Viewing/Remote Influ­enc­ing pro­grams. I am con­fi­dent that they will make a big dif­fer­ence in my life (for the bet­ter). How­ever, I do not want to ref­er­ence sources that are sus­pect when try­ing to turn my friends onto this rev­o­lu­tion­ary field. I know they’ll have the same questions.

    I hope this com­ment will not post directly to your blog. I would actu­ally pre­fer that it not. Again, I am NOT try­ing to be a jerk. Per­haps I missed some­thing? I would gen­uinely appre­ci­ate any insight you might have into these questions.

    Respect­fully,

    George Bryant

    Please con­tact me at — mthd_music@yahoo.com

Leave a Reply


Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://blog.learnremoteviewing.com/2008/05/23/remote-viewing-part-of-a-greater-synchronized-universe/trackback/