US Navy SEAL and Commander Supports Remote Viewing
The Government has tried so hard to conceal its Remote Viewing efforts, before trying to debunk it as a project that failed.
In 2001, former US Navy Commander (now Navy SEAL) L. R. Bresmseth submitted a paper on Remote Viewing entitled, "Unconventional Human Intelligence Support: Transcendant and Assymetric Warfare Implications of Remote Viewing" as part of his studies at Marine War College in Quantico, Virginia.
Bremsweth is acclaimed as having sensitively written an overview on the research, development, and operations involving the remote viewing operations conducted by the US Government from 1972 to 1995. His paper covers the reason why the US Government was interested in remote viewing due to Soviet research, and that the preliminary and subsequent scientific studies funded by the US Army, US Air Force, CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency were a success and that remote viewing for 'transcendent warfare' can be used beyond national intelligence, defense, and warfare.
What's surprising is that Bremseth theorizes about the covert operations that he suspects the CIA is still continuing with remote viewing:
Navy SEAL officer's report on 'remote viewing' urges 'transcendent' intelligence
Bremseth asks what many others have also considered: Was the once-secret official program overtly shut down so that ongoing covert research and operations could continue?
He examines the question directly. "One can legitimately ask ... why the CIA, after ending 'official' support in 1975 continued tasking the program for intelligence support until 1995, when it then orchestrated the program´s demise? If the CIA considered the remote viewing program incapable of producing substantive results, why did it continue requesting remote viewing intelligence support for almost twenty-four years?"
Bremseth asks, "Did the CIA terminate the remote viewing program because it feared ridicule by association, or did it stage a 'public execution' as a means of taking the program underground? Both are legitimate questions. The first is understandable given perception of paranormal activities by many within American society, as well as the CIA's past experiences involving controversial research efforts."
"Arguably, the second question is more intriguing as it implies that the CIA recognized the value of remote viewing, yet intended to make it appear otherwise."
Click here to learn more >>
Rate this Article
(1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ...
I've been a remote viewing enthusiast who has been blogging about this field for the last 2 years. More recently I've had the opportunity to personally meet and interview many of the leaders in this field including Ed Dames and Gerald O'Donnell. I share my stories, my interviews and interesting articles I've found on remote viewing here on this blog. Enjoy Reading. 
The only way to be sure is for the people to learn RV, so they don't have to depend on what officials says is true or not true. There's something very interesting I saw in this manual on teleporting; there's one section on psychokinetic teleportation wherein the subjects (in one of China's Enhanced Human projects) had a prerequisite of remote viewing exercises. Reminds me of principle invoked by Gerald wherein we can remotely influence that which we remotely view. Is psi-teleportation one possible effect of remote influencing? Look up the Teleportation Physics Study by Eric W. Davis.