Because I’m so enthusiastic about remote viewing, I enjoy reading up as much as I can not only on techniques and exercises but also how this amazing phenomenon was birthed. This article is a joy to read and it briefs you, my fellow enthusiast, on a very detailed (and possibly surprising) history of the wonder that is remote viewing.
Remote Viewing — A Historical Account
If God held all truth concealed in his right hand and in his left hand the persistent striving for the truth… and should say, “Choose!” I should humbly bow before his left hand and say, ‘Father, give me striving. For pure truth is for thee alone.’
—Gotthold Lessing
Let me begin by saying that as I have studied in the various civilian and military universities I have attended; I have been witnesses to, and personally held many academic and intellectual views on what the “truth” is about many things. The author, Felipe Fernandez-Armesto wrote, ‘truth, time and history are found in paintings and not in books [or essays] born of the recollections of others.’ As I grow older, I have come to maintain that truth has been and always will be, a matter of one’s perception, captured and held briefly in the moment, and then faded into memory. I teach a segment in Phase I of the Coordinate Remote Viewing class, on truth or reality, as it exists only in the moment, whereas all else in the future or the past is illusion—becoming increasing possibilities in time, increasing interpretations, increasing angles of reconstruction, increasing notions, and amalgams of ideas and emotions. Even when there is an alleged consensus of opinion or recollection of the past—it is really only interpretive data that is “agreed upon.” Recollection is not fact, in fact, it is only fiction… a creation born in the minds of those who agreed on a version to suit their own agenda… whatever that agenda may be.
For those interested in the “truth” of the latter, you can search the mathematical explanation for these notions, which are supported in the work of physicist and Nobel laureate, P. Dirac, Ph.D. Time drags truth into history, but history itself does not care, only those who attempt to record and recount it care; and they fall victim to their own perceptions and willing acceptance of what is—according to them. The truth about Remote Viewing is trapped between fundamentalists, who believe they have the only truth, and relativists, who refuse to pin it down.
I’ve been working with this system–remote viewing–for a bit now and am very impressed with the results. I’m also quite interested in Buddhism, particularly the teaching of interdependence which articulates the idea that everything is connected and is sort of like when a butterfly beats its wings in HongKong you can experience effects in New York (or something like that anyway). The teaching regarding the inherrent empty nature of our universe is also a fun one to explore, especially since with remote viewing we can make everything mean anything. I am also interested in neural linguistic programming, which shows us how we create our illusion of reality through different filtering mechanisms which can be identified by way of language; for instance noticing what motivates a person is good in any situation, and being able to communicate with them by way of using their map of communication means that you’re much more likely to get what you want in this world. I’ve also studied Gerrald’s course in remote influencing and have figured out that all I need to do to keep all of these different components of my philosophy straight all I have to do is go to my center of being wherein everything is laid out nicely sort of like in a big toolbox that contains all I need to do what I came here to do. I believe that remote viewing is a very interesting inovation in our consciousness, and we can more clearly articulate this same wisdom that some Tebetan scholars have known about for thousands of years before remote viewing was a gleam in the creator’s eye. It helps us understand the understandable because we can reach across the isle to a brother and ask him “Hey, can you give me some feedback on this thing I’m working on, and sort of monetor what’s going on and give me your creative input” and get another perspective on something we thought we knew. Very invigorating, to say the least, to know that one can utilize these tools to know quite literally everything in this universe and perhaps others. That’s a bit much for me personally, and maybe some day I’ll remote view the one who accomplishes this, but it sounds good and what’s more it’s true.
PS: When are we going to get that Gerrald interview? Don’t even edit it, just put it up; if you don’t mind sending me the uneddited version due to you wanting to cut some things out before the public hears it that would be awesome because I’ve got a lot riding on our research right now with respect to the golden light etc and I want to know how the progress with this project is going. Remote influencing can get a bit hecktick and out there at times and I want to be sure that I’m still on the path somewhat.
PPS: could you perhaps post something regarding your experiences with Gerald’s course (I assume you’ve taken it) for instance about the golden light or crystaline structure? I don’t know how we’ll discuss these things, but I’m having way too much fun by myself! Thanks again and keep up the good work, and perhaps we’ll meet on the path durring the dream or for real (who knows).