Here is an excerpt of the an investigative search by the Skeptical Enquirer for a man who, although he formerly worked for the DEA, went into hiding and was remote viewed (although they didn’t act on the remote viewer’s lead…)

Skeptical Briefs newsletter, March 2001

Investigative Files : Remotely Viewed? The Charlie Jordan Case

by Joe Nickell

Seeking a Fugitive

Such criticisms are clearly raised by the Charlie Jordan case. Charles Frank Jordan had been an agent for the U.S. Customs section of the Drug Enforcement Agency in south Florida. Once a trusted employee who had helped fight drug smuggling in the southern coastal areas of the state and in the Florida Keys, Jordan became a “Customs rotten apple.” He was found to be “taking bribes to let other people bring drugs in” (Green 1998). When he learned he was suspected, he fled, evading an intensive search for two years, during which he was even featured on the television series America’s Most Wanted (Graff 2000).

In spring 1989, the Customs Service sought the help of the DIA’s remote-viewing unit. The psychics “saw” the fugitive in a variety of locales, including south Florida, the Caribbean, and Central America. One, however, supposedly “narrowed down his location” to an area of northern Wyoming. Although the alleged “information” was never acted on, Jordan was captured some weeks later at a place that allegedly tallied with the envisioned Wyoming site.

Read the full article on Skeptical Inquirer HERE

Remote Viewing Updates: Art Bell welcomed foremost remote viewing teacher Major Ed Dames, who discussed some current cases of his Matrix Intelligence Agency as well as provided updates on past predictions. This show was aired on coast to coast radio on Friday, May 23.

Major Ed Dames interview “WOW” Could it be? 1 of 12

Predicting headlines using Remote Viewing

The Truth Behind Creation

In An Even More Controversial Interview:

Gerald O’Donnell Digs Deeper…

…And Reveals The Truth Behind Creation With Insights That Will Simultaneously Shock Both the Religious And The Atheist

  Take Me There NOW!

FREE Unique Interview

With Gerald O’Donnell

In the interview, Gerald O’Donnell teaches us…

• …any system that operates upon creation operates with the Mind / Intelligence at its root
• …there is only Mind - nothing else exists, but is a Creation of Mind
• …we are all swimming in a gigantic mind which gives us our sense of reality
• …the existence of a creator and subcreators of our universes, and our own contribution to creation as individuals
• …reality is just a projection from within to the outside and you can only perceive yourself from the perspective of you watching what you think is you
• …nobody is in the same universe, but we are share the same information injected with perception operating within space and time, which gives us the illusion that we are interacting with each other in the same universe
• …the truth about the first man created by the creator, and how "Adam" in the "garden of Eden", by being able to manifest anything he could think of, up to the point where it went out of his control, had to go back down to the lowest level – which – we call rather experience now as our life on earth – in order to climb back up to Higher Intelligence, the Creator and the garden
• …in reality we are all vibratory particles of light trying to evolve back to the higher consciousness
• …how to use the delta level with full awareness to project your own creation by influencing the vibratory particles of light that we are made of
• …how the victims of mass consciousness such victims of war, concentrations camps and disasters actually somehow co-create their reality BUT how by climbing up to much higher vibratory consciousness they could have changed the reality and stop this in their universes.
• …the scientific proof that the brain already knows what decision the a human awareness is going to make before that human is even aware of making that decision – This proves that we live in a movie projected from within
• …and much, much more…

CLICK HERE TO GET ACCESS TO THIS FREE AND EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW WITH GERALD O’DONNELL!

Please be sure to read this article in conjunction with watching Ed Dame’s remote viewing video which I have posted below. To watch Ed Dame’s remote viewing video, click here.

Sun goes longer than normal without producing sunspots

June 09, 2008 — By Evelyn Boswell, Montana State University News Service

BOZEMAN — The sun has been laying low for the past couple of years, producing no sunspots and giving a break to satellites.

That’s good news for people who scramble when space weather interferes with their technology, but it became a point of discussion for the scientists who attended an international solar conference at Montana State University. Approximately 100 scientists from Europe, Asia, Latin America, Africa and North America gathered June 1-6 to talk about "Solar Variability, Earth’s Climate and the Space Environment."

The scientists said periods of inactivity are normal for the sun, but this period has gone on longer than usual.

"It continues to be dead," said Saku Tsuneta with the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, program manager for the Hinode solar mission. "That’s a small concern, a very small concern."

The Hinode satellite is a Japanese mission with the United States and United Kingdom as partners. The satellite carries three telescopes that together show how changes on the sun’s surface spread through the solar atmosphere. MSU researchers are among those operating the X-ray telescope. The satellite orbits 431 miles above ground, crossing both poles and making one lap every 95 minutes, giving Hinode an uninterrupted view of the sun for several months out of the year.

Dana Longcope, a solar physicist at MSU, said the sun usually operates on an 11-year cycle with maximum activity occurring in the middle of the cycle. Minimum activity generally occurs as the cycles change. Solar activity refers to phenomena like sunspots, solar flares and solar eruptions. Together, they create the weather than can disrupt satellites in space and technology on earth.

The last cycle reached its peak in 2001 and is believed to be just ending now, Longcope said. The next cycle is just beginning and is expected to reach its peak sometime around 2012. Today’s sun, however, is as inactive as it was two years ago, and scientists aren’t sure why.

"It’s a dead face," Tsuneta said of the sun’s appearance.

Tsuneta said solar physicists aren’t like weather forecasters; They can’t predict the future. They do have the ability to observe, however, and they have observed a longer-than-normal period of solar inactivity. In the past, they observed that the sun once went 50 years without producing sunspots. That period coincided with a little ice age on Earth that lasted from 1650 to 1700.

Tsuneta said he doesn’t know how long the sun will continue to be inactive, but scientists associated with the Hinode mission are ready for it to resume maximum activity. They have added extra ground stations to pick up signals from Hinode in case solar activity interferes with instruments at other stations around the world. The new stations, ready to start operating this summer, are located in India, Norway, Alaska and the South Pole.

Establishing those stations, as well as the Hinode mission, required international cooperation, Tsuneta said. No one country had the resources to carry out those projects by itself.

Four countries, three space agencies and 11 organizations worked together on Hinode which was launched in September 2006, Tsuneta said. Among the collaborators was Loren Acton, a research professor of physics at MSU. Tsuneta and Acton worked together closely from 1986-2002 and were reunited at the MSU conference.

"His leadership was immense, superb," Tsuneta said about Acton.

Acton, 72, said he is still enthused by solar physics and the new questions being raised. In fact, he wished he could knock 22 years off his age and extend his career even longer.

"It’s too much fun," he said. "There’s so much exciting stuff come up, I would like to be part of it."

A related article on the Hinode mission is located at http://www.montana.edu/cpa/news/nwview.php?article=4902

Major Ed Dames had already predicted all these things…that’s the power of remote viewing: it’s amazing to see even beyond what science can see today.

To watch Ed Dame’s video where he remote viewed all these things a long time ago, click here.

You must watch this video.

You can watch the full video, The Killshot, in which Major Ed Dames explains what he and his team have remote viewed, as well the history of the celestial body that will intersect with earth’s orbit - this is according to thousands of ancient writings. To watch the video, click here.

Chances that it would happen again are very small.

New interview with Gerald O’Donnell is coming soon.

Last time Gerald was talking about:

Using the Mind’s Power to Remote Influence

Let me share with you some of the topics he is going to talk about:

This time the main subject will be the inner workings of the Mind.

He will explain in detail how the Total Mind works and the functioning of the human bio-electrical brain and the background of Quantum Light Higher Mind.

What are really mind states such as beta, alpha, Theta and Delta.

Do they really exist?

• And why reaching certain deep inner states allow one to access different Higher abilities.
• Why is it that when one goes into deeper states of mind psychic phenomena are common and so is the connection to someones’ else’s mind?
• The question will be asked as to the relationship between brain and mind.
• Is the brain the seat of thought?
• Why is it that when humans depart they can and do keep their memories alive (experienced in NDE)?
• Has the brain created the mind (intelligence) or has mind (intelligence) created the brain? Kind of a chicken and egg question.
• Gerald will explain why he perceives that the whole universe without exception is a universe made out of mind and that there’s really nothing besides Thought.
• This will then explain abilities such as remote viewing and remote influencing.
• He’ll talk about the relationship between the inner states outside of time and space and their projections upon the outer world operating in space/time.
• Do you know that you constantly blink in and our of reality with parallel selves and universes and they are all YOU?

What is really the Unified Field?

OK I stop here as I do not want to give out much more now.

So If you have related question and subjects that you would like Gerald to cover please email it to me or post them here.

and

If for any reason you still haven’t listen to the amazing interview with Gerald O’Donnell, check it here

Video of Major Ed Dames in a remote viewing exercise a while back…

When police investigations go cold, the Remote Viewing investigation unit, operated by retired military intelligence officer, Major Ed Dames is called in. Only accepting a few public operations a year, these cases have never previously been seen by public eyes as usually the presence of news and camera crews are restricted. This behind-the-scenes look into the world of professional Remote Viewing is truly an unprecedented peek into what really goes on behind closed doors.

This is the second article, The CIA Gets Hip To A New Intelligence Tool, in the three-part series by Mike Jamieson.

You can read the first part (part 1) - Adoption of the term “Remote Viewing” by clicking here.

Part 2 - THE CIA GETS HIP TO A NEW INTELLIGENCE TOOL

First published 8th August 2007

Less than a year after Ingo Swann “remote viewed” weather conditions in Tucson, Arizona as part of experiments conducted at the New York City offices of the American Society of Psychical Research, the CIA would be giving an independent research organization, formerly a part of Stanford University until divested to its nuclear research projects, an “exploratory contract” of $49,909 to do classified research into the viability and potential of remote viewing.

The person at Stanford Research Institute (SRI) chosen to oversee this initial eight month project (called Biofield Measurements Program) was Hal Puthoff, at that time working on laser research at SRI. Joining him later would be a colleague (from laser research and also with an interest in parapsychology), Russell Targ.

Puthoff in a 1996 paper recounts the history of “CIA-Initiated Remote Viewing at Stanford Research Institute”.

That paper could be written because in July 1995 the CIA declassified papers and reports generated by SRI’s research and use of remote viewing for the benefit of the CIA.

(see http://www.militaryremoteviewers.com/cia_remote_viewing_sri.htm)

Another detailed account, in the form of an online book was written by Ingo Swann (who along with a man named Pat Price would be the remote viewing participants in this initial remote viewing project on the CIA’s behalf).

(see http://www.biomindsuperpowers.com and the link there)

And, perhaps most valuable of all due to the author’s access to not only his own notes of involvement in an unit of the government’s remote viewing operations since 1983 but also his interviews with most of the key figures (including Puthoff and Swann), is the book “Reading the Enemy’s Mind: America’s Psychic Espionage Program” by Paul H. Smith.

Famed Pulitzer Prize journalist Jack Anderson wrote the forward to this book and summarizes his own history of examining and reporting on this long secret program.

(People can see Smith’s website, http://www.rviewer.com, for more information.)

In March 1972, Swann saw some intriguing correspondence, a paper on “quantum biology” by Hal Puthoff, at Cleve Backster’s home in New York. (During this time Swann was still doing experiments at the American Society of Psychical Research.)

Swann soon wrote to Puthoff, sharing his experiences with the early experiments that attempted a PK influence over organic matter. Puthoff responded not longer after by phone and the stage was being set for Swann to visit SRI early in June 1972.

Puthoff prepared a surprise test for Swann on this first visit, involving getting access to a shielded, quark detecting magnetometer at Stanford University’s Physics Department. On his visit, it appeared Swann was able to disturb the operation of the magnetometer (while located on the floor above the vault).

He further went on to impress Puthoff by drawing details of the the complex interior of the magnetometer. (No such schematics had been published prior to this.)

All this so impressed Puthoff that he wrote a paper about it and circulated it among scientific colleagues. What in particular impressed Puthoff were Swann’s detailed drawings of the magnetometer’s make-up. And, this is what also what impressed the two CIA representatives who showed up shortly after Puthoff sending his report out. They also had a copy of the report.

(After this visit, Puthoff did write to Dr. Christopher “Kit” Green about the experiment. Green was then at the Life Science Desk, part of the CIA’s Office of Strategic Intelligence. Puthoff’s contact with him begin their many years of association.)

No one writing the history of remote viewing seems to know how these two CIA visitors came across Puthoff’s paper, but they were aware that Puthoff had worked as a Naval Intelligence Officer and then later as a civilian employee with the National Security Agency (NSA).

And, Puthoff reports in his account of this meeting that these representatives from the CIA expressed concern about Soviet parapsychological research and utilization of psychic skills as an intelligence tool. (Puthoff references a later-1978-paper by the Defense Intelligence Agency, identified as DST-18105-202-78 and entitled “Paraphysics R and D–Warsaw Pact U.)

The visitors explained that they had been looking for a research laboratory that was unconnected formally with an academic institution and that could serve as a quiet, low-profile place for classified research and investigation. SRI seemed to fit the bill. So, as a result, they gave SRI a small amount of money to fly Ingo Swann out to Stanford and have him participate in some tests to observe and evaluate his remote viewing skills.

This testing and evaluation happened in August 1972. CIA scientists came out to participating in testing and evaluating Swann’s potential enhanced perceptual abilities. Basically, Swann was asked to remote view the contents of sealed containers.

In three cases, the CIA visitors placed items in three sealed boxes (contents picked and known only by them). Swann did well altogether, though he was very puzzled by what he saw in one of the boxes prepared by the CIA visitors. He thought he saw a “brown leaf” floating up by the underside of the lid. In fact, the CIA guys had placed a large brown moth in the box.

These trials were sufficient to move the CIA to fund on October 1, 1972 (the first day of the government’s fiscal year for 1973) a contract with SRI in the amount of $49,909 for exploratory research into parapsychology. This contract would fund the research for eight months (which began in January 1973).

This is the third in a series of articles by Mike Jamieson, the well known researcher and former MUFON state section director for Napa County in California.
Mike is a valued member of the REALITY uncovered forums and this article is the second part of his enthralling “History of Remote Viewing” feature.

You can read Part 1 (Adoption of the term “Remote Viewing”) by clicking here, and Part 2 (The CIA Gets Hip To A New Intelligence Tool) by clicking here.

Part 3 - ALL YOU REALLY NEED IS AN ADDRESS

10th May 2008
The focus for the first few months of SRI’s initial 8 month long study for the CIA was on PK effects, but with minimal success (and a lack of consistency) in the results, SRI experimentation refocused on the potentials of RV for use by their current client.

It was not clear at first how remote viewing, in the way they had been experimenting with it, would be of use to any intelligence agencies. The most typical way they had been practicing it was to send “outbounder” teams to a site which the viewer would then focus on (via the presence of the team).

The group at SRI was mulling this over with only a short time left on the initial CIA contract (May ‘73 to Aug. ‘73, with the contract having begun in January). A visitor to SRI, Jacques Vallee, suggested a simple solution: “All you really need is an address.”

Swann in turn suggested the use of geographic coordinates, something Puthoff and Targ thought didn’t make sense due to the fact that coordinates were artificial and abstract representations.

But, preliminary experiements (sic) were satisfactory enough and the CIA itself offered coordinates to a wooded area in the hills of West Virginia. So far as the CIA person offering the coordinates knew, there was only a vacation cabin at the site.

Ingo Swann and another man named Pat Price were tasked with remote viewing this location. (Price had recently heard about the project and, feeling he had a psychic aptitude, volunteered for experiments.)

Both Swann and Price described a partially underground military like facility not far from the cabin! (Confirmed in followup visits and consultations.)

Not only were the descriptions of the site (again, unknown even to the provider of the coordinates) accurate, but the CIA’s project manager for the SRI contract, Dr. Ken Kress, noted: “Pat Price, who had no military or intelligence background, provided a list of project titles associated with current and past activities including one of extreme sensitivity.

Also, the code-name of the site was provided. Other information concerning the physical layout of the site was accurate.” [pages 72-73, Ken Kress, "Parapsychology in Intelligence: A Personal Review and Conclusions", STUDIES IN INTELLIGENCE, Washington, DC, CIA, Winter 1977.]

Other double-blind coordinates were tasked for the remote viewers before the CIA contract ended in August 1973 and since the results were good overall, CIA support for this research at SRI continued until 1975.

Ingo Swann would take a year long break from this study, but in addition to Pat Price, others would become involved: Hella Hammid (professional photographer), Duane Elgin (SRI employee), Gary Langford and Keith Harary.

Pat Price’s participation in RV efforts changed directions when he began working with the CIA directly, in the months just prior to his unexpected death in Las Vegas in July 1975. Not long after Price died (an event about which some people have questions), the CIA dropped out of the RV business. Being under fire in Congressional hearings over past questionable practices, they were reluctant to hold onto what might be controversial.

Also very important: there was strong disagreement within the CIA over using remote viewing. Many there felt it was neither real nor potentially useful.

Paul Smith reports in his book Reading The Enemies’ Mind (”chronicling America’s psychic espionage program”) that “even though a few in-house CIA employees had shown some success with remote viewing, and Price himself was now working exclusively for the agency and coming up with results corroborated by other intelligence information the CIA had already obtained, this ongoing debate contributed to the termination of CIA involvement after Price’s sudden death in July 1975″ [p.76, paperback edition]

A year before he died, Pat Price was still working for SRI, though, and that’s when he was given the task of remote viewing a research and development facility in the old Soviet Union (near Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan). After receiving the coordinates (on July 19, 1974), Price reported his impressions of that location from the several remote viewing sessions he did over the following two weeks.

Some of his descriptions were confirmed by satellite imagery: a large gantry crane that rode on rails and that passed over a 2-3 story building and the presence of gas cylinders. But not confirmed for another few years were 60 foot diameter steel spheres that Price described being assembled.

The story of this particular remote viewing impressed many in the intelligence community, but by July 1975 many others there felt that the fact Price produced a lot of bad data and otherwise descriptions that could be neither evaluated or confirmed made RV useless as an intelligence tool.

• For example, this was the conclusion of the officers at the CIA’s Office of Research and Development when the CIA’s involvement with RV ended in 1975.

The SRI team spent its last stretch of time under CIA contract partially examining the nature of RV phenomena (and seeing what factors enhanced successful use). But, they more importantly focused on remote viewing’s potential uses.

• For example, a series of double blind experiments, with 12 remote viewers targeting 7 pieces of instruments and machinery, yielded some very detailed and accurate sketches.

At this stage, Paul Smith reports in history that some key conclusions and observations had been made by those involved in the SRI study. He also notes that at this point “it was also just two years into the program, and many lessons about tasking, analysis, and reporting of remote viewing data were yet to be learned.” [p.68, paperback edition].

So far as some of the understandings acquired from the study, Smith summarizes some, like these key points: (1) concrete descriptions more accurate than labeling and analysis; (2) using several remote viewers for a single task improved quality of the final data; (3) anybody could be taught RV; and, RV improves with practice.

• Though the CIA ended its involvement with RV in the summer of 1975, later in the year SRI’s research effort would be sustained by funding from the Air Force Foreign Technology Division at Wright Patterson. This came about through the interest of a civilian employee there, Dale Graff.
• Then, two years later an Army Lt. (”Skip” Atwater) begins forming an Army RV program at the direction of Army Assistant Chief of Staff Intelligence, Maj. Gen. Edmund Thompson.
• The DIA assumes control of the program.
• Early 1980s, the remote viewing procedure is structured and training CRV to government remote viewers begins.
• The Remote Viewing process (as commonly taught).
• Questions, controversies, debates.